Instruments as Belief-Driven Entities: Reconceptualizing the Interplay of Beliefs and Policy Instruments
Hauptsächlicher Artikelinhalt
Abstract
In order to understand the processes of policy instrumentation, it is of crucial importance to understand the reasoning and motivation of policymakers’ choices. In this contribution, we combine the belief system approach of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) with insights from constructivist policy instrument theory and develop an analytical tool for analyzing the role of policymakers’ beliefs in instrumentation. We argue that policy instruments are not only empirical “tools” but are cognitive and political entities to which policymakers assign meaning. Policy instruments are value-laden carriers of beliefs and embody problem representations, values, objectives, instrument-impact expectations and strategies of individual policymakers. Their selection is not solely based on technical criteria; instrumentation as a process is characterized by contention regarding problem representations and their appropriate solutions. This suggests that the belief levels within the ACF may not be strictly hierarchical, but rather interrelated in a web and inform each other mutually. As a result, we call for a reconsideration of the hierarchical conceptualization of belief levels within the ACF’s concept of belief systems. This has the following consequences: a change in secondary beliefs may affect changes in core beliefs. Moreover, we argue strategic considerations should be added to the belief system concept as its own category.
Keywords: policy instruments, instrumentation, belief systems, Advocacy Coalition Framework, policy formulation
Bibliographie: Gerstenberg, Anne & Schnapp, Kai-Uwe (2025). Instruments as Belief-Driven Entities: Reconceptualizing the Interplay of Beliefs and Policy Instruments. dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 18(1-2025), 35-51.
Artikel-Details
Literatur
Bacchi, Carol (2009). Analysing Policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson Higher Education AU.
Bijker, Wiebe E. (1993). Do Not Despair: There Is Life after Constructivism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18(1), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800107
Böcher, Michael (2012). A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.012
Capano, Giliberto&Howlett, Michael (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. Sage Open, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568
Daigneault, Pierre-Marc (2014). Reassessing the concept of policy paradigm: Aligning ontology and methodology in policy studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.834071
Dewey, John (1939). Theory of valuation. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Vol. II, Number 4. University of Chicago Press.
Dye, Thomas R. (2017). Understanding public policy (15th ed.). Pearson.
Festinger, Leon (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row, Peterson and Company.
Fischer, Frank (2003). Discourse Versus Advocacy Coalitions: Interpreting Policy Change and Learning. In Frank Fischer (Ed.), Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices (pp. 94–114). Oxford University Press.
Gerstenberg, Anne & Schnapp, Kai-Uwe (2025). The politics of climate policy instruments: investigating policymakers’ belief systems in EU climate policymaking. der moderne staat, 18(1), 52–72.
Goldstein, Judith & Keohane, Robert O. (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Cornell University Press.
Hall, Peter A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
Heclo, Hugh & Wildavsky, Aaron B. (1974). The private government of public money: Community and policy inside British politics. University of California Press.
Henry, Adam D., Ingold, Karin, Nohrstedt, Daniel, & Weible, Christopher M. (2022). Advocacy Coalition Framework Advice on Applications and Methods. In S. Workman & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Methods of the Policy Process (pp. 105–137). Routledge.
Hood, Christopher C. (1983). The Tools of Government. Macmillan Education UK.
Howlett, Michael (2005). What is a policy instrument? Policy tools, policy mixes and policy styles. In Pearl Eliadis, Margaret M. Hill, & Michael Howlett (Eds.), Designing government: From instruments to governance (pp. 31–50). McGill-Queen’s Press.
Howlett, Michael (1991). Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation: National approaches to theories of instrument choice. Policy Studies Journal, 19(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1991.tb01878.x
Howlett, Michael (2014). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47, 187–207.
Howlett, Michael, & Goetz, Klaus H. (2014). Introduction: Time, temporality and timescapes in administration and policy. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314543210
Howlett, Michael,&Ramesh, Michael (1993). Patterns of policy instrument choice: Policy styles, policy learning and the privatization experience. Review of Policy Research, 12(1–2), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1993.tb00505.x
Ingold, Karin (2011). Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Nohrstedt, Daniel, Weible, Christopher M., & Sabatier, Paul A. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In Paul A. Sabatier & Christopher M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 183–224). Routledge.
Jordan, Andrew, Benson, David, Wurzel, Rüdiger, & Zito, Anthony (2011). Policy Instruments in Practice. In John S. Dryzek, Richard B. Norgaard, & David Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (pp. 536–549). Oxford University Press.
Kalyanpur, Nikhil, & Newman, Abraham (2017). Form over function in finance: International institutional design by bricolage. Review of International Political Economy, 24(3), 363–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2017.1307777
Kamkhaji, Jonathan C., & Radaelli, Claudio M. (2022). Don’t think it’s a good idea! Four building sites of the ‘ideas school.’ West European Politics, 45(4), 841–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1959751
Kammermann, Lorenz,&Angst, Mario (2021). The Effect of Beliefs on Policy Instrument Preferences: The Case of Swiss Renewable Energy Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 49(3), 757–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12393
Kingdon, John W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (2nd ed.). HarperCollins.
Kukkonen, Anna, Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas, & Broadbent, Jeffrey (2017). Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States. Public Administration, 95(3), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12321
Landry, Ré Jean, & Varone, Frédéric (2005). The Choice of Policy Instruments: Confronting the Deductive. In Pearl Eliadis, Margaret M. Hill, & Michael Howlett (Eds.), Designing government: From instruments to governance (pp. 106–131). McGill-Queen’s Press.
Lascoumes, Pierre, & Le Galès, Pierre (2007). Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
Lascoumes, Pierre, Le Galès, Patrick, & Halpern, Charlotte (2014). L’instrumentation de l’action publique: Controverses, résistance, effets. Presses de Sciences Po. https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.halpe.2014.01
Le Galès, Patrick (2022). Policy instrumentation with or without policy design. In B. Guy Peters & Guillaume Fontaine (Eds.), Research Handbook of Policy Design (pp. 88–103). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Leifeld, Philip (2013). Reconceptualizing Major Policy Change in the Advocacy Coalition Framework: A Discourse Network Analysis of German Pension Politics. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12007
Linder, Stephen H., & Peters, B Guy (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00007960
Linder, Stephen H.,&Peters,BGuy (1998). The study of policy instruments: Four schools of thought. In B Guy Peters & Frans K. M. van Nispen (Eds.), Public policy instruments: Evaluating the tools of public administration (pp. 33–45). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Luhmann, Niklas (1973). Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität: Über die Funktion von Zwecken in sozialen Systemen. Suhrkamp.
Majone, Giandomenico (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press.
March, James G., & Olson, Johan P. (1983). Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 77(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958916
Mayntz, Renate (1971). Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Zu dem gleichnamigen Buch von Niklas Luhmann. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 91(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.91.1.57
Muller, Pierre (1995). Les politiques publiques comme construction d’un rapport au monde. In A. Faure, G. Pollet, & P. Warin (Eds.), Débats autour de la notion de référentiel. (pp. 153–179). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Nohrstedt, Daniel, Ingold, Karin, Weible, Christopher M., Koebele, Elizabeth A., Olofsson, Kristin L., Satoh, Keiichi, & Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (2023). The Advocacy Coalition Framework—Progress and Emerging Areas. In C. M. Weible (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (5th ed., pp. 130–160). Routledge.
Putnam, Hilary (1976). The Comparative Study Of Political Elites. Prentice-Hall.
Ralston, Rob, Godziewski, Charlotte, & Carters-White, Lauren (2023). The many meanings of policy instruments: Exploring individual and structural determinants in obesity policy. Policy & Politics, 51(2), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16762984942169
Ringeling, Arthur (2005). Instruments in Four: The Elements of Policy Design. In Pearl Eliadis, Margaret M. Hill, & Michael Howlett (Eds.), Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance (pp. 185–202). McGill-Queen’s Press.
Ringeling, Arthur, & van Nispen, Frans (1998). On instruments and instrumentality: A critical assessment. In B. Guy Peters, Frans van Nispen, & Maurice Falk (Eds.), Public Policy Instruments. Evaluating the tools of public administration (pp. 204–217). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sabatier, Paul A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policyoriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
Sabatier, Paul A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051
Sabatier, Paul A., & Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In Paul A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (1st ed., pp. 117–166). Westview Press.
Schmidt, Vivien A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
Schneider, Anne, & Ingram, Helen (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510–529. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131904
Schneider, Anne, & Ingram, Helen (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044
Simons, Arno, &Voß, Jan-Peter (2017). Policy instrument constituencies. In Michael Howlett & Ishani Mukherjee (Eds.), Handbook of Policy Formulation (pp. 355–372). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Stewart, Jenny (2009). Public Policy Values. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Simons, Arno, & Voß, Jan-Peter (2018). The concept of instrument constituencies: Accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance. Policy and Society, 37(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1375248
Trebilcock, Michael J.,&Hartle, Douglas G. (1982). The choice of governing instrument. International Review of Law and Economics, 2(1), 29–46.
Voß, Jan-Peter (2007). Innovation processes in governance: The development of “emissions trading” as a new policy instrument. Science and Public Policy, 34(5), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X228584
Voß, Jan-Peter, & Simons, Arno (2014). Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.923625
Weible, Christopher M. (2018). Instrument Constituencies and the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An essay on the comparisons, opportunities, and intersections. Policy and Society, 37(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1417705
Weible, Christopher M., Olofsson, Kristin L., & Heikkila, Tanya (2023). Advocacy coalitions, beliefs, and learning: An analysis of stability, change, and reinforcement. Policy Studies Journal, 51(1), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12458
Westerman, Pauline C. (1999). Means and Ends. In Willem J. Witteveen&Wibren Van der Burg (Eds.), Rediscovering Fuller (pp. 145–168). Amsterdam University Press.
Zahariadis, Nikolaos (2021). Coalitions and Values in the Flow of Policy Solutions. In Phillippe Zittoun, Frank Fischer,&Nikolaos Zahariadis (Eds.), The Political Formulation of Policy Solutions (pp. 93–114). Bristol University Press.
Zittoun, Philippe, Fischer, Frank, & Zahariadis, Nikolaos. (2021). Introduction. In Philippe Zittoun, Frank Fischer, & Nikolaos Zahariadis (Eds.), The Political Formulation of Policy Solutions: Arguments, Arenas, and Coalitions (pp. 1–21). Bristol University Press.