The Politics of Climate Instruments: Investigating Policymakers’ Belief Systems in EU Climate Policymaking
Hauptsächlicher Artikelinhalt
Abstract
Common policy process theories underrepresent the politics of policy formulation, and ignore instruments as normatively charged meaning structures. We applied the belief systems approach of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) to analyse the European Union’s (EU) multi-level climate policy-making in the realm of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS), to uncover EU and German policymakers’ beliefs. Our results demonstrate that climate policy is politicized through instruments, despite goal-unanimity. In five ‘worlds of thought’, we explicate ‘appropriate’ solutions (instrument belief) as part of implicit ideational frames, constituted by a problem-representation (policy-core beliefs), and visions of a climate-mitigated world (deep-core beliefs). The main cleavage moves around the statemarket relationship, between carbon pricing purists and more helps more policymakers. Many former purists accept a policy mix after ‘instrument-based learning’. Discursively marginalized degrowth-supporters back the ETS pragmatically, while other false-flag policymakers support it rhetorically, but undermine it for industry protection.
Keywords: climate policy, policy instruments, instrument beliefs, Advocacy Coalition Framework, belief system approach
Bibliographie: Gerstenberg, Anne & Schnapp, Kai-Uwe (2025). The Politics of Climate Instruments: Investigating Policymakers’ Belief Systems in EU Climate Policymaking. dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 18(1-2025), 52-72.
Artikel-Details
Literatur
Bertram, Christoph, Luderer, Gunnar, Pietzcker, Robert C., Schmid, Eva, Kriegler, Elmar & Edenhofer, Ottmar (2015). Complementing carbon prices with technology policies to keep climate targets within reach. Nature Climate Change, 5(3), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2514
Böcher, Michael (2012). A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.012
Buller, Adrienne (2022). The value of a whale on the illusions of green capitalism. Manchester University Press.
Carbon Market Watch (2023, May 5). Emissions Trading System exemptions betray the steel sector’s power and politicians’ lack of mettle. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2023/05/05/emissions-trading-system-exemptions-betray-the-steel-sectors-power-and-politicians-lack-of-mettle/
Daigneault, Pierre-Marc (2014). Reassessing the concept of policy paradigm: Aligning ontology and methodology in policy studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.834071
Dupont, Claire, Moore, Brendan, Boasson, Elin Lerum, Gravey, Viviane, Jordan, Andrew, Kivimaa, Paula, Kulovesi, Kati, Kuzemko, Caroline, Oberthür, Sebastian, Panchuk, Dmytro, Rosamond, Jeffrey, Torney, Diarmuid, Tosun, Jale & von Homeyer, Ingmar (2023). Three decades of EU climate policy: Racing toward climate neutrality? WIREs Climate Change, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.863
Eckert, Eva & Kovalevska, Oleksandra (2021). Sustainability in the European Union: Analyzing the Discourse of the European Green Deal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020080
Edenhofer, Ottmar (2014). Reforming emissions trading. Nature Climate Change, 4(8), 663–664. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2327
European Commission (2023, October 9). Legal documents on Delivering the European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/publications/legal-documents-delivering-european-green-deal_en
Fitch-Roy, Oscar, Fairbrass, Jenny & Benson, David (2020). Ideas, coalitions and compromise: Reinterpreting EU-ETS lobbying through discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1567573
Fransen, Taryn, Meckling, Jonas, Stünzi, Anna, Schmidt, Tobias S., Egli, Florian, Schmid, Nicolas & Beaton, Christopher. (2023). Taking stock of the implementation gap in climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 13, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01755-9
Gengnagel, Vincent & Zimmermann, Katharina (2022). The European Green Deal as a Moonshot–Caring for a Climate-Neutral Yet Prospering Continent? Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 47(4), 267–302. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.47.2022.47
Goldstein, Judith & Keohane, Robert O. (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Cornell University Press.
Goodman, Nelson (1978). Ways of Worldmaking. Hackett Publishing.
Hajer, Maarten A. (1997). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
Hall, Peter A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
Harris, Jonathan M. (2013). Green Keynesianism: Beyond standard growth paradigms (13–02; Working Papers). Global Development and Environment Institute. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/179111/
Henry, Adam Douglas, Ingold, Karin, Nohrstedt, Daniel & Weible, Christopher M. (2022). Advocacy Coalition Framework Advice on Applications and Methods. In Samuel Workman&Christopher M. Weible (Eds.), Methods of the Policy Process (pp. 105–137). Routledge.
Hickel, Jason (2021). What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification. Globalizations, 18(7), 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222
Hood, Christopher C. (1983). The Tools of Government. Macmillan Education UK.
Howlett, Michael (2005). What is a policy instrument? Policy tools, policy mixes and policy styles. Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773581708-004
Huwe, Vera&Rehm, Miriam (2022). The ecological crisis and post-Keynesian economics – bridging the gap? European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 19(3), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2022.03.08
Ingold, Karin (2011). Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Nohrstedt, Daniel, Weible, Christopher M. & Sabatier, Paul A. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In Paul. A. Sabatier & Christopher M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 183–224). Routledge.
Kallis, Giorgos (2011). In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007
Kammermann, Lorenz & Angst, Mario (2021). The Effect of Beliefs on Policy Instrument Preferences: The Case of Swiss Renewable Energy Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 49(3), 757–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12393
Kukkonen, Anna, Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas & Broadbent, Jeffrey (2017). Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States. Public Administration, 95(3), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12321
Lamb, William F., Mattioli, Giulio, Levi, Sebastian, Roberts, J. Timmons, Capstick, Stuart, Creutzig, Felix, Minx, Jan C., Müller-Hansen, Finn, Culhane, Trevor & Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13
Lascoumes, Pierre & Le Galès, Patrick (2007). Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through its Instruments? From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
Le Galès, Patrick (2022). Policy instrumentation with or without policy design. In B.G. Peters & Guillaume Fontaine (Eds.), Research Handbook of Policy Design (pp. 88–103). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Leifeld, Philip (2013). Reconceptualizing Major Policy Change in the Advocacy Coalition Framework: A Discourse Network Analysis of German Pension Politics. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12007
Linder, Stephen H. & Peters, B. Guy (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00007960
Markard, Jochen & Rosenbloom, Daniel (2020). Political conflict and climate policy: The European emissions trading system as a Trojan Horse for the low-carbon transition? Climate Policy, 20(9), 1092–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1763901
Münch, Sybille (2016). Interpretative Policy-Analyse. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Nohrstedt, Daniel, Ingold, Karin, Weible, Christopher M., Koebele, Elizabeth A., Olofsson, Kristin L., Satoh, Keiichi & Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (2023). The Advocacy Coalition Framework—Progress and Emerging Areas. In Christopher M. Weible (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (5th ed., pp. 130–160). Routledge.
Patt, Anthony & Lilliestam, Johan (2018). The Case against Carbon Prices. Joule, 2(12), 2494–2498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.018
Perino, Grischa, Jarke-Neuert, Johannes, Schenuit, Felix, Wickel, Martin & Zengerling, Cathrin (2022). Closing the Implementation Gap: Obstacles in Reaching Net-Zero Pledges in the EU and Germany. Politics and Governance, 10(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5326
Perino, Grischa, Ritz, Robert A. & Van Benthem, Arthur (2019). Understanding Overlapping Policies: Internal Carbon Leakage and the Punctured Waterbed. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.38655
Perino, Grischa, Willner, Maximilian&Pahle, Michael (2021). Den EU-Emissionshandel zukunftsfähig gestalten Ein verbesserter Stabilitätsmechanismus für verlässlicheren Klimaschutz (Kopernikus-Projekt Ariadne, Ed.). https://ariadneprojekt.de/media/2021/04/Ariadne-Analyse_MSR-Review_April2021.pdf
Reyes, Victoria, Bogumil, Elizabeth&Welch, Levin Elias (2024). The Living Codebook: Documenting the Process of Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociological Methods&Research, 53(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120986185
Ringeling, Arthur (2005). Instruments in Four: The Elements of Policy Design. In Pearl Eliadis, Margaret M. Hill & Michael P. Howlett (Eds.), Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance (pp. 185–202). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Rosenbloom, Daniel, Markard, Jochen, Geels, Frank. W. & Fuenfschilling, Lea (2020). Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change – And how “sustainability transition policy” can help. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004093117
Sabatier, Paul A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policyoriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
Sabatier, Paul A. (1991). Toward better theories of the policy process. Political Science&Politics, 24(2),
147–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/419923
Sabatier, Paul A. & Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In Paul A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (1st ed., pp. 117–166). Westview Press.
Schmidt, Vivien A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
Stewart, Jenny (2009). Public Policy Values. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Van Den Bergh, Jeroen&Botzen, Wouter (2024). Assessing Criticisms of Carbon Pricing. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 18(3), 315–384. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000172
Voß, Jan-Peter (2007). Innovation processes in governance: The development of “emissions trading” as a new policy instrument. Science and Public Policy, 34(5), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X228584
Voß, Jan-Peter & Simons, Arno (2014). Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.923625
Weible, Christopher M. (2018). Introduction: The Scope and Focus of Policy Process Research and Theory. In Christopher M. Weible & Paul A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed., pp. 1–13). Routledge.
Wettestad, Jørgen (2005). The making of the 2003 EU emissions trading directive: An ultra-quick process due to entrepreneurial proficiency? Global Environmental Politics, 5(1), 1–23.
Wettestad, Jørgen & Jevnaker, Torbjørg (2016). Rescuing EU emissions trading: The climate policy flagship. Springer.
Wettestad, Jørgen & Jevnaker, Torbjørg (2019). Smokescreen Politics? Ratcheting Up EU Emissions Trading in 2017. Review of Policy Research, 36(5), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12345
Willner, Maximilian & Perino, Grischa (2022). Beyond Control: Policy Incoherence of the EU Emissions Trading System. Politics and Governance, 10(1), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4797
Yanow, Dvora (2000). Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. SAGE.
Zahariadis, Nikolaos (2021). Coalitions and Values in the Flow of Policy Solutions. In Philippe Zittoun, Frank Fischer&Nikolaos Zahariadis (Eds.), The Political Formulation of Policy Solutions (pp. 93–114). Bristol University Press.