Micropolitics in Carbon Pricing: Ethnographic Insights into the Introduction of Germany’s Emissions Trading System

Hauptsächlicher Artikelinhalt

Rafael Postpischil

Abstract

Carbon pricing is considered a key instrument against the climate crisis, yet adoption remains hesitant. Existing research offers limited insights into its real-world policy processes, especially regarding aspects of power and micropolitics. Therefore, I conducted an ethnographic analysis of the introduction of the national Emissions Trading System (nETS) in Germany. Despite being a key climate actor, Germany has long been hesitant in pricing its emissions. The nETS-introduction in 2019 was thus unexpected by policymakers and advisors. Using sensitizing concepts of factors, means, and levels of power, I conducted two months of participant observation at the Federal Environment Ministry (BMU) and 17 semistructured interviews. Key factors for the nETS-introduction include noticeable climate impacts, large-scale protests, and EU climate-targets with potential penalty payments. Advocacy from BMU actors, pro-climate Conservatives, scientific advisors, businesses, and labor unions overcame longstanding resistance. Different means of power and micropolitics within these factors proved essential to understand the nETS-introduction. These include personal experiences of climate impacts, becoming aware of EU penalties, close relations between advisors and decision-makers, and partisan framing to enable compromises. The study underscores that micropolitics—such as interpersonal trust, tacit beliefs, and internal conflicts — can substantially shape policy processes.
Keywords: Policy Process Research, Micropolitics, Political Ethnography, Carbon Pricing, Emissions Trading


Leseprobe
Online-Anhang


Bibliographie: Postpischil, Rafael (2025). Micropolitics in Carbon Pricing: Ethnographic Insights into the Introduction of Germany’s Emissions Trading System. dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 18(1-2025), 140-161.

Artikel-Details

Erscheinungsdatum: August 2025
Open Access ab: 14.08.2027
Open-Access-Lizenz: CC BY 4.0

Literatur

Agora Energiewende & Agora Verkehrswende (2018). Die Kosten von unterlassenem Klimaschutz für den Bundeshaushalt. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin/Projekte/2018/Non-ETS/142_Nicht-ETS-Papier_WEB.pdf

Andersen, Mikael S. (2019). The politics of carbon taxation: how varieties of policy style matter. Environmental Politics, 28(6), 1084–1104.

Andersen, Mikael S.,&Milne, Janet E. (2012). The future agenda for environmental taxation research. In Mikael S. Andersen & Janet E. Milne (Eds.), Handbook of research on environmental taxation (pp. 479–493). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Andres, Leander, Fabel, Marc, Flückiger, Matthias, Ludwig, Markus, Rainer, Helmut, Waldinger, Maria, & Wichert, Sebastian (2022). Trägt die Fridays-for-Future-Bewegung zum politischen Klimawandel bei? Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2022-05-andres-etal-fridays-forfurture.pdf

Bild (2018). LITER SPRIT BALD 2 EURO? SPD-Ministerin plant Sondersteuer auf Benzin und Heizöl. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/politik-inland/co2-steuer-geplant-benzin-und-heizoel-sollen-spuerbar-teurer-werden-58315312.bild.html

Birkholz, Sina, Bochmann, Annett,&Schank, Jan (2020). Ethnografie und Teilnehmende Beobachtung. In Claudius Wagemann, Achim Goerres, & Markus B. Siewert (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft (pp. 325–350). Wiesbaden/Heidelberg: Springer.

BMUV (2018). Rede von Svenja Schulze zur “Umweltpolitik der Bundesregierung in der 19. Wahlperiode. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.bmuv.de/rede/rede-von-svenja-schulze-zur-umweltpolitik-der-bundesregierung-in-der-19-wahlperiode

Böcher, Michael (2012). A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 14–22.

Bothner, Fabio, Schrader, Svenja Marie, Bandau, Frank, & Holzhauser, Nicole (2022). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: the introduction of supplemental carbon taxes in Europe. Journal of Public Policy, 42(2), 343–363.

Braathen, Nils Alex (2012). The political economy of environmental taxation. In Mikael S. Andersen & Janet E. Milne (Eds.), Handbook of research on environmental taxation (pp. 230–248). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Cairney, Paul (2013). What is evolutionary theory and how does it inform policy studies? Policy & Politics, 41(2), 279–298.

Cairney, Paul (2020). Power and Public Policy. In Paul Cairney (Ed.), Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues (2nd ed., pp. 86–114). London: Red Globe Press.

Cairney, Paul, & Heikkila, Tanya (2023). How Should We Compare Theories of the Policy Process? In Christopher M. Weible & Paul A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 291–321). London: Routledge.

Cairney, Paul, & Kwiatkowski, Richard (2017). Psychology Based Policy Studies: what can we learn from psychology about how policymakers think, act, and use evidence? Accessed 12/13/2024, https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/cairney-kwiatkowski-palgrave-comms-6-4-17.pdf

CLEW (2019). Tracking the CO2 price debate in Germany. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/tracking-co2-price-debate-germany

CLEW (2024). Germany’s carbon pricing system for transport and buildings – Factsheet, 2024. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/germanys-planned-carbon-pricing-system-transport-and-buildings?pk_campaign=daily_newsletter_2021-07-02&pk_keyword=germanys-planned-carbon-pricing-system-transport-and-buildings&pk_source=newsletter&pk_medium=email&pk_content=readmore

Del Río, Pablo,&Labandeira, Xavier (2009). Barriers to the introduction of market-based instruments in climate policies: an integrated theoretical framework. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 10(1), 41–68.

Der Spiegel (2018). CO2-Ausstoß: Deutsche Forscher fordern Steuer auf Kohlendioxid. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/soziales/co2-forscher-fordern-steuer-auf-kohlendioxid-a-1241270.html

Der Spiegel (2019). “Umverteilungsmaschinerie”: Vorsitzender der CDU-Klimakommission gegen CO2-Steuer. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/vorsitzender-der-cdu-klimakommission-georg-nuesslein-gegen-co2-steuer-a-1272593.html

Dolphin, Geoffroy, Pollitt, Michael G, & Newbery, David M. (2019). The political economy of carbon pricing: a panel analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 72(2), 472–500.

Edenhofer, Ottmar, Flachsland, Christian, Kalkuhl, Matthias, Knopf, Brigitte, & Pahle, Michael (2019). Bewertung des Klimapakets und nächste Schritte. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://mcc-berlin.net/fileadmin/data/B2.3_Publications/Working%20Paper/2019_MCC_Bewertung_des_Klimapakets_final.pdf

Edenhofer, Ottmar, Franks, Max,&Kalkuhl, Matthias (2021). Pigou in the 21st Century: a tribute on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the publication of The Economics of Welfare. International Tax and Public Finance, 28(5), 1090–1121.

EEA (2022). The role of (environmental) taxation in supporting sustainability transitions, 2022. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/the-role-of-environmental-taxation/the-role-of-environmental-taxation

Euractiv (2019). Carbon pricing dropped from new Franco-German treaty. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/franco-german-new-cooperation-treaty-drops-carbon-price/European Commission (2024). ETS2: buildings, road transport and additional sectors. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/ets2-buildings-road-transport-and-additional-sectors_en

FAZ (2019). CO2-Steuer? Zertifikate? Beides! Accessed 12/13/2024, https://ccep.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/uploads/ccep_crawford_anu_edu_au/2019-08/jotzo_loeschel_co2steuer_or_ets_-_faz_-_text_0.pdf

Flachsland, Christian, & Levi, Sebastian (2021). Germany’s Federal Climate Change Act. Environmental Politics, 30(1), 118–140.

Flachsland, Christian, Müller, Thorsten, Kemmerzell, Jörg, Edmondson, Duncan, Görlach, Benjamin, Kalkuhl, Matthias, et al. (2021). Wie die Governance der deutschen Klimapolitik gestärkt werden kann. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://ariadneprojekt.de/media/2021/11/Ariadne-Kurzdossier_Governance_November2021.pdf

Handelsblatt (2018). Regierung will wegen Klimawandel auch CO2-Abgabe prüfen. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/klimawandel-regierung-will-wegen-klimawandel-auch-co2-abgabe-pruefen/23771944.html

Heiskala, Risto (2018). For a holistic social science: the NACEVP model applied to the environment, gender and populism. Journal of Political Power, 11(3), 322–340.

Hoppe, Robert,&Colebatch, Hal K. (2018). Policy and the theorising of governing. In Hal K. Colebatch&Robert Hoppe (Eds.), Handbook on Policy, Process and Governing (pp. 474–500). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hughes, Llewelyn,&Urpelainen, Johannes (2015). Interests, institutions, and climate policy: explaining the choice of policy instruments for the energy sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 52–63.

IPCC (2023). AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/

Karapin, Roger (2020). The political viability of carbon pricing: policy design and framing in British Columbia and California. Review of Policy Research, 37(2), 140–173.

Keohane, Nathaniel O, Revesz, Richard L, & Stavins, Robert N. (1998). The choice of regulatory instruments in environmental policy. Environmental Law, 491–545.

Konc, Théo, Drews, Stefan, Savin, Ivan, & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M. (2022). Co-dynamics of climate policy stringency and public support. Global Environmental Change, 74.

Konisky, David M. (2023). The politics of climate policy instruments. Political Science & Politics, 57(1), 21–24.

Levi, Sebastian (2021). Why hate carbon taxes? Machine learning evidence on the roles of personal responsibility, trust, revenue recycling, and other factors across 23 European countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 73.

Levi, Sebastian, Flachsland, Christian, & Jakob, Michael (2020). Political economy determinants of carbon pricing. Global Environmental Politics, 20(2), 128–156.

Mann, Michael (2012). The sources of social power: Volume 4, Globalizations, 1945–2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mayring, Philipp (2021). Qualitative content analysis: A step-by-step guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.

MCC & PIK (2019). Optionen für eine CO2-Preisreform. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.mcc-berlin.net/fileadmin/data/B2.3_Publications/Working%20Paper/2019_MCC_Optionen_f%C3%BCr_eine_CO2-Preisreform_final.pdf

Meckling, Jonas, & Jenner, Steffen (2016). Varieties of market-based policy: instrument choice in climate policy. Environmental Politics, 25(5), 853–874.

Nielsen, Helle Ørsted (2012). Bounded rationality in an imperfect world of regulations: what if individuals are not optimizing? InMikael S. Andersen & Janet E. Milne (Eds.), Handbook of research on environmental taxation (pp. 439–448). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

O’Reilly, Karen (2012). Ethnographic methods (2nd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.

OECD (2023). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Germany 2023. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-environmental-performance-reviews-germany-2023_f26da7da-en

Rennkamp, Britta (2019). Power, coalitions and institutional change in South African climate policy. Climate Policy, 19(6), 756–770.

RP Online (2019). Merkel will die Klimapolitik umkrempeln. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://rp-online.de/politik/deutschland/merkel-will-die-klimapolitik-umkrempeln_aid-39261369

Rüb, Friedbert W. (2021). Mikropolitologie. In Karl-Rudolf Korte&Martin Florack (Eds.), Handbuch Regierungsforschung (2nd ed., pp. 569–580). Wiesbaden: Springer.

Schaffer, Lena M. (2021). The politics of green taxation. In Lukas Hakelberg & Laura Seelkopf (Eds.), Handbook on the Politics of Taxation (pp. 208–227). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Schatz, Edward (2009). What kind(s) of ethnography does political science need. In Edward Schatz (Ed.), Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power (pp. 303–318). Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.

Schlegelmilch, Kai (2005). Insights in political processes on the ecological tax reform from a ministerial perspective. In Applied research in environmental economics (Vol. 31, pp. 299–314). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

Serres, Alain de, Murtin, Fabrice, & Nicoletti, Giuseppe (2010). A Framework for Assessing Green Growth Policies. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5kmfj2xvcmkfen.pdf

Skovgaard, Jakob, Ferrari, Sofía Sacks, & Knaggård, Åsa (2019). Mapping and clustering the adoption of carbon pricing policies: what polities price carbon and why? Climate Policy, 19(9), 1173–1185.

Spash, Clive L. (2010). The Brave New World of Carbon Trading. New Political Economy, 15(2), 169–195.

Stoll, Christian, & Mehling, Michael A (2021). Climate change and carbon pricing: overcoming three dimensions of failure. Energy Research & Social Science, 77.

SVR (2019). Sondergutachten 2019: Aufbruch zu einer neuen Klimapolitik. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.sachverstaendigenrat-wirtschaft.de/sondergutachten-2019.html

Switek, Niko (2014). Die Satzung ist nicht genug! Parteien unter dem Mikroskop der strategischen Organisationsanalyse. In Stephan Bröchler & Timo Grunden (Eds.), Informelle Politik. Konzepte, Akteure und Prozesse (pp. 219–244). Wiesbaden: Springer.

Tagesspiegel (2019). Global Solutions Summit: Ein Aufruf für mehr internationale Zusammenarbeit. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/global-solutions-summit-ein-aufruf-fuer-mehr-internationale-zusammenarbeit/24114228.html

Thisted, Ebbe V., & Thisted, Rune V. (2020). The diffusion of carbon taxes and emission trading schemes: the emerging norm of carbon pricing. Environmental Politics, 29(5), 804–824.

Töller, Annette Elisabeth (2012). Regieren als Problemlösung oder als eigendynamischer Prozess? Überlegungen zu einer Überwindung des Problemlösungsbias in der Politikfeldanalyse. In Regieren (pp. 171–190). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Willner, Roland (2011). Micro-politics: An underestimated field of qualitative research in political science. German Policy Studies, 7(3), 155–185.

Wirtschaftswoche (2018). CO2-Abgabe: Olaf Scholz bremst Svenja Schulze aus. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://www.wiwo.de/politik/deutschland/teureres-heizoel-und-benzin-scholz-bremst-schulze-bei-diskussion-um-neue-co2-abgabe-aus/23601846.html

Woerdman, Edwin (2004). The Institutional Economics of Market-Based Climate Policy. Elsevier.

World Bank (2024). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2024. Accessed 12/13/2024, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/b0d66765-299c-4fb8-921f-61f6bb979087

Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, & Huß, Christian (2016). How well does the multiple-streams framework travel? Evidence from German case studies. In Reimut Zohlnhöfer & Friedbert W. Rüb (Eds.), Decision-Making under Ambiguity and Time Constraints: Assessing the Multiple-Streams Framework (pp. 169–188). Colchester: ECPR Press.

Mehr lesen