Who engages with environmental issues in a multi-level system? An exploratory analysis of German parties’ issue emphasis
Hauptsächlicher Artikelinhalt
Abstract
Environmental policies are central to contemporary politics. Consequently, parties are incentivized to shape public discourse on environmental issues – a tendency particularly pronounced for left-wing parties. Within the European Union’s (EU) multi-level political system, this is a complex undertaking, as environmental policies are frequently decided and implemented across various political tiers. Utilizing a newly developed dictionary focused on environmental issues, we examine German parties’ emphasis on these issues in EU, federal, regional, and local election manifestos from 1989 to 2021. Our findings indicate that parties’ strategic considerations are the primary factors correlating with variations in their environmental issue emphasis across political levels. Particularly non-left-wing parties place less emphasis on environmental issues when facing electoral competition from successful Green parties at the same political level. Moreover, left-wing parties have a stronger incentive to emphasize environmental policies, including explicit state interventions. Yet, this electoral challenge is significant only within the same political level and not across different levels. Furthermore, the economic context in which parties compete is crucial: they tend to place greater emphasis on environmental issues when economic conditions are more favorable.
Keywords: environment, issue emphasis, Germany, multi-party systems, multi-level systems
Bibliographie: Braun, Daniela & Gross, Martin (2025). Who engages with environmental issues in a multi-level system? An exploratory analysis of German parties’ issue emphasis. dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 18(1-2025), 162-184.
Artikel-Details
Literatur
Abou-Chadi, Tarik (2016). Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000155
Abou-Chadi, Tarik & Kayser, Mark A. (2017). It’s not easy being green: Why voters punish parties for environmental policies during economic downturns. Electoral Studies, 45, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.10.009
Benoit, Kenneth, Bräuninger, Thomas & Debus, Marc (2009). Challenges for Estimating Policy Preferences: Announcing an Open Access Archive of Political Documents. German Politics, 18(3), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000903055856
Benoit, Kenneth, Watanabe, Kohei, Wang, Haiyan, Nulty, Paul, Obeng, Adam, Müller, Stefan & Matsuo, Akitaka (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774
Bery, Sanya & Haddad, Mary Alice (2023). Walking the Talk: Why Cities Adopt Ambitious Climate Action Plans. Urban Affairs Review, 59(5), 1385–1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221098951
Braun, Daniela (2023). Text analysis of party manifestos. In Neil Carter, Daniel Keith, Gyda M. Sindre & Sofia Vasilopoulou (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Parties (pp. 439–449). London: Routledge.
Braun, Daniela and Martin Gross (2025). Replication Data for: Who engages with environmental issues in a multi-level system? An exploratory analysis of German parties’ issue emphasis. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/6km7v/
Budge, Ian & Farlie, Dennis J. (1983). Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Carter, Neil, Ladrech, Robert, Little, Conor & Tsagkroni, Vasiliki (2018). Political parties and climate policy: A new approach to measuring parties’ climate policy preferences. Party Politics, 24(6), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817697630
Carter, Neil & Little, Conor (2021). Party competition on climate policy: The roles of interest groups, ideology and challenger parties in the UK and Ireland. International Political Science Review, 42(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120972582
Chudnowsky, Mariana&Fernandez, José Carlos (2024). The study of climate change: the need to “bring the state back in”. npj Climate Action, 3(39), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00122-4
Cotta, Benedetta (2023). Unpacking the eco-social perspective in European policy, politics, and polity dimensions. European Political Science, 23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-023-00453-6
Däubler, Thomas (2012). Wie entstehen Wahlprogramme? Eine Untersuchung zur Landtagswahl in Baden-Württemberg 2006. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 22(3), 333–365. https://doi.org/10.5771/1430-6387-2012-3-333
Debus, Marc & Tosun, Jale (2021). The manifestation of the green agenda: a comparative analysis of parliamentary debates. Environmental Politics, 30(6), 918–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1864130
Enguer, Joan (2024). Comparing Regional and National Climate Policy Preferences: An Analysis of Political Parties in the Basque Country and Catalonia. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 55(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjae035
Enguer, Joan&Navarrete, Rosa M. (2023). Protecting the climate to challenge the centre? Secessionism and climate policy preferences in Catalonia. Regional & Federal Studies, 35(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2023.2263834
European Parliament (2025): Fact Sheets on the European Union, Environment Policy: General Principles and Basis Framework, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/71/environment-policy-general-principles-and-basic-framework (accessed: December 18 2024).
Fagerholm, Andreas (2016). Social democratic parties and the rise of ecologism: A comparative analysis of Western Europe. Comparative European Politics,14(5), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.34
Farstad, Fay M. (2018). What explains variation in parties’ climate change salience? Party Politics, 24(6), 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817693473
Grant, Zack P. & Tilley, James (2019). Fertile soil: explaining variation in the success of Green parties. West European Politics, 42(3), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1521673
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer (2019). The Reshaping of West European Party Politics: Agenda-Setting and Party Competition in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842897.001.0001
Grimmer, Justin, Roberts, Margaret E. & Stewart, Brandon M. (2022). Text as Data: A New Framework for Machine Learning and the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Grimmer, Justin & Stewart, Brandon M. (2013). Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028
Gross, Martin, Nyhuis, Dominic, Block, Sebastian&Velimsky, Jan A. (2024). Electoral Campaigns and Parliamentary Practice: Do Parties Pursue the Issues They Campaigned On? Swiss Political Science Review, 30(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12588
Gross, Martin, Nyhuis, Dominic, Block, Sebastian & Velimsky, Jan A. (2025). The Impact of Institutional and Financial Constraints on Party Behaviour in Local Politics. Swiss Political Science Review. Online First: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12628
Gross, Martin & Debus, Marc (2018). Does EU regional policy increase parties’ support for European integration? West European Politics, 41(3), 594–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1395249
Gross, Martin & Jankowski, Michael (2020). Dimensions of political conflict and party positions in multi-level democracies: evidence from the Local Manifesto Project. West European Politics, 43(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1602816
Gross, Martin & Krauss, Svenja (2021). Topic Coverage of Coalition Agreements in Multi-Level Settings: The Case of Germany. German Politics, 30(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2019.1658077
Gross, Martin, Krauss, Svenja&Praprotnik, Katrin (2023). Electoral strategies in multilevel systems: the effect of national politics on regional elections. Regional Studies, 57(5), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2107193
Heidtmann, Katharina F.F. & Selck, Torsten J. (2021). Local level failure? Non-compliance of EU environmental policy within EU multi-level governance. Regional & Federal Studies, 34(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1998006
Jänicke, Martin&Quitzow, Rainer (2017). Multi-level Reinforcement in European Climate and Energy Governance: Mobilizing economic interests at the sub-national levels. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1748
Javeline, Debra (2014). The Most Important Topic Political Scientists Are Not Studying: Adapting to Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 420–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714000784
Jordan, A. (1999). Editorial Introduction: The Construction of a Multilevel Environmental Governance System. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1068/c170001
Kenny, John & Langsæther, Peter Egge (2023). Environmentalism as an independent dimension of political preferences. European Journal of Political Research, 62(4), 1031–1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12549
King, Julie P. (2022). Sixteen ways to adapt: a comparison of state-level climate change adaption strategies in the federal states of Germany. Regional Environmental Change, 22(40), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01870-3
Kristensen, Thomas Artmann, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, Mortensen, Peter B. & Seeberg, Henrik Bech (2022). Avoiding or engaging problems? Issue ownership, problem indicators, and party issue competition. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(12), 2854–2885. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2135754
Kristensen, Thomas Artmann, Mortensen, Peter Bjerre, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Seeberg, Henrik Bech (2023). The policy agenda effects of problem indicators: a comparative study in seven countries. Journal of Public Policy, 43(2), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X22000307
Laver, Michael & Garry, John (2000). Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669268
Lind, Fabienne, Eberl, Jakob-Moritz, Heidenreich, Tobias & Boomgaarden, Hajo G. (2019). When the Journey Is as Important as the Goal: A Roadmap to Multilingual Dictionary Construction. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4000–4020.
Little, Conor (2023). Parties and Climate Change. In Neil Carter, Daniel Keith, Gyda M. Sindre & Sofia Vasilopoulou (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Parties (pp. 280–300). London: Routledge.
Morrison, Tiffany H., Adger, Neil W., Agrawal, Arun, Brown, Katrina, Hornsey, Matthew J., Hughes, Terry P., Jain, Meha, Lemos, Maria Carmen, Holmes McHugh, Lucy, O’Neill, Saffron & Van Berkel, Derek (2022). Radical interventions for climate-impacted systems. Nature Climate Change, 12, 1100–1106. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01542-y
Rauh, Christian (2018). Validating a sentiment dictionary for German political language – a workbench note. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(4), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1485608
Reif, Karlheinz & Schmitt, Hermann (1980). Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
Rodriguez, Pedro L. & Spirling, Arthur (2022). Word Embeddings: What Works, What Doesn’t, and How to Tell the Difference for Applied Research. The Journal of Politics, 84(1), 101–115.
Schakel, Arjan H. & Romanova, Valentyna (2023). Moving beyond the second-order election model? Three generations of regional election research. Regional & Federal Studies, 33(4), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2023.2241014
Schmitt, Hermann, Braun, Daniela & Popa, Sebastian A. (2021). European Parliament Elections – Euromanifesto Study (Documents 1979–2014). GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5163 Datenfile Version 1.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.5163
Schwörer, Jakob (2024). Mainstream parties and global warming: What determines parties’ engagement in climate protection? European Journal of Political Research, 63(1), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12602
Schwörer, Jakob & Fernández-García, Belén (2023). Climate Sceptics or Climate Nationalists? Understanding and Explaining Populist Radical Right Parties’ Positions towards Climate Change (1990–2022). Political Studies, 72(3), 1178–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231176475
Seeberg, Henrik Bech (2017). How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time, Cross-National Analysis. Political Studies, 65(2), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716650224
Spoon, Jae-Jae, Hobolt, Sara B. & de Vries, Catherine E. (2014). Going green: Explaining issue competition on the environment. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12032
Stecker, Christian (2015). Parties on the Chain of Federalism: Position-Taking and Multi-level Party Competition in Germany. West European Politics, 38(6), 1302–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1029366
Strøm, Kaare & Müller, Wolfgang C. (1999). Political parties and hard choices. In Kaare Strøm & Wolfgang C. Müller (Eds.), Policy, Office, or Votes?: How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions (pp. 1–35).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625695.001
Tobin, James (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382
Tosun, Jale (2023). The European Union’s Climate and Environmental Policy in Times of Geopolitical Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(S1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13530
Wickham, Hadley (2014). Tidy data. Journal of Statistical Software 59(10), 1–23.