Measuring Discursive Lock-In with the Narrative Policy Framework: An Analysis of Public Debates on Fossil Gas in Germany
Hauptsächlicher Artikelinhalt
Abstract
This article measures the phenomenon of discursive lock-in via narratives, as conceptualized by the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF). Discursive lock-in underlies other forms of carbon lock-in that hinder societies from phasing out fossil fuels. Thus, being able to assess the characteristics of discursive lock-in is fundamental for its destabilization. In applying the proposed measurement to German newspaper articles on fossil gas that appeared both before and after the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, the analysis shows that although attention towards fossil gas rose, the discursive lock-in got reinforced, with the proportion of narratives not questioning gas usage remaining stable and critical narratives bemoaning the building of new fossil fuel infrastructure. These findings highlight the resilience of fossil-friendly narratives even in the face of EU-level policy shifts such as the Green Deal and REPowerEU. The combination of discursive lock-in and the NPF proves to be fruitful and opens avenues for future research.
Keywords: Fossil Gas, Discursive Lock-In, Narrative Policy Framework, Germany, Energy Transition
Bibliographie: Kuenzler, Johanna (2025). Measuring Discursive Lock-In with the Narrative Policy Framework: An Analysis of Public Debates on Fossil Gas in Germany. dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 18(1-2025), 185-206.
Artikel-Details
Literatur
Bachrach, Peter,& Baratz, Morton S. (1962). Two Faces of Power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952796
Baumgartner, Frank R., & Jones, Bryan D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press.
Béland, Daniel,&Howlett, Michael (2016). The Role and Impact of the Multiple-Streams Approach in Comparative Policy Analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410
Bundesregierung. (2024). Kraftwerksstrategie für wasserstofffähige Kraftwerke. Für eine klimafreundliche und sichere Energieversorgung. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/kraftwerksstrategie-2257868
Buschmann, Pia, & Oels, Angela (2019). The overlooked role of discourse in breaking carbon lock‐in: The case of the German energy transition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.574
Büüsker, Ann-Kathrin (2022, March 24). Die Bedeutung von Gas für die deutsche Energieversorgung. Deutschlandfunk, 2022. https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/energieversorgung-russland-deutschland-100.html
Chang, Katherine T., & Koebele, Elizabeth A. (2020). What Drives Coalitions’ Narrative Strategy? Exploring Policy Narratives around School Choice. Politics & Policy, 48(4), 618–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12367
Crow, Deserai A., & Berggren, John (2014). Using the Narrative Policy Framework to Understand Stakeholder Strategy and Effectiveness:AMulti-Case Analysis. In Michael D. Jones, Elizabeth A. Shanahan, & Mark K. McBeth (Eds.), The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis (pp. 131–156). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137485861
Crow, Deserai A., & Jones, Michael D. (2018). Narratives as Tools for Influencing Policy Change. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230061022899
Delborne, Jason A., Hasala, Dresden, Wigner, Aubrey, & Kinchy, Abby (2020). Dueling metaphors, fueling futures: “Bridge fuel” visions of coal and natural gas in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 61, 101350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101350
European Commission. (2019, December 11). The European Green Deal sets out how to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050, boosting the economy, improving people’s health and quality of life, caring for nature, and leaving no one behind. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_19_6691
European Commission. (2023). EU taxonomy for sustainable activities. European Commission. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/tools-and-standards/eu-taxonomy-sustainable-activities_en
European Commission. (2025). REPowerEU. Affordable, secure and sustainable energy for Europe.
European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/repowereu-affordable-secure-and-sustainable-energy-europe_en
Fridays for Future Niedersachsen. (2022). LNG-Terminals. https://fridaysforfuture-niedersachsen.de/lng-terminals/
Gottlieb, Madeline, Bertone Oehninger, Ernst, & Arnold, Gwen (2018). “No Fracking Way” vs. “Drill Baby Drill”: A Restructuring of Who Is Pitted Against Whom in the Narrative Policy Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 46(4), 798–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12291
Gühmann, Sylvie (2024). Erdgasleitungen im Wattenmeer. Tausende Menschen demonstrieren auf Borkum gegen “Bohrkum”. Spiegel. https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/borkum-luisa-neubauer-demonstriert-mit-tausenden-gegen-erdgasleitungen-a-c6362a4c-a5bb-4d4e-a110-15e7a0a675b3
Hachmeister, Lutz (2012). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Mediendatenbank. Institut für Medien- und Kommunikationspolitik. https://www.mediadb.eu/de/forum/zeitungsportraets/sueddeutsche-zeitung.html
Hermwille, Lukas (2016). The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001
Herweg, Nicole, Zahariadis, Nikolaos,&Zohlnhöfer, Reimut (2017). The Multiple Streams Framework: Foundations, Refinements, and Empirical Applications. In Christopher M. Weible & Paul A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 17–53). Westview Press.
International Energy Agency. (2020). Methane emissions are the second largest cause of global warming. https://www.iea.org/articles/global-methane-emissions-from-oil-and-gas
Janzwood, Amy, & Harrison, Kathryn (2023). The political economy of fossil fuel production in the Post-Paris Era: Critically evaluating Nationally Determined Contributions. Energy Research & Social Science, 102, 103095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103095
Jones, Michael D., Smith-Walter, Aaron, McBeth, Mark K., & Shanahan, Elizabeth A. (2023). The Narrative Policy Framework. In Christopher M. Weible (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (Fifth edition). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Jones, Michael D., & Song, Geoboo (2014). Making Sense of Climate Change: How Story Frames Shape Cognition. Political Psychology, 35(4), 447–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12057
Kahneman, Daniel, & Tversky, Amos (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
Kahneman, Daniel, & Tversky, Amos (Eds.). (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press.
Kemfert, Claudia, Präger, Fabian, Braunger, Isabell, Hoffart, Franziska M., & Brauers, Hanna (2022). The expansion of natural gas infrastructure puts energy transitions at risk. Nature Energy, 7(7), 582–587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01060-3
Kepplinger, Hans M., & Lemke, Richard (2016). Instrumentalizing Fukushima: Comparing Media Coverage of Fukushima in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. Political
Communication, 33(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1022240
Kuenzler, Johanna, Stauffer, Bettina, Schlaufer, Caroline, Song, Geoboo, Smith-Walter, Aaron, & Jones, Michael D. (2024). A systematic review of the Narrative Policy Framework: a future research agenda. Policy & Politics, 53(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2024D000000046
Kuenzler, Johanna, Vogeler, Colette, Parth, Anne-Marie, & Gohl, Titian (2024). Exploring the eternal struggle: The Narrative Policy Framework and status quo versus policy change. Policy Sciences, 57(3), 485–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-024-09537-6
Marquardt, Jens & Nasiritousi, Naghmeh (2022). Imaginary lock-ins in climate change politics: the challenge to envision a fossil-free future. Environmental Politics, 31(4), 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1951479
Mišík, M.Matúš, & Nosko, Andrej (2023). Post-pandemic lessons for EU energy and climate policy after the Russian invasion of Ukraine: Introduction to a special issue on EU green recovery in the post-Covid-19 period. Energy Policy, 177, 113546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113546
UN News. (2018). Climate change: An ’existential threat’ to humanity, UN chief warns global summit. https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/05/1009782
Patton, Michael Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications. Pointner, Nicola (2010). In den Fängen der Ökonomie? Ein kritischer Blick auf die Berichterstattung über Medienunternehmen in der deutschen Tagespresse. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Schaub, Simon (2021). Public contestation over agricultural pollution: A discourse network analysis on narrative strategies in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 54(4), 783–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09439-x
Schlaufer, Caroline, Gafurova, Dilyara, Zhiryakova, Ekaterina, Shikhova, Marina, & Belyaeva, Nina (2023). Narrative strategies in a nondemocratic setting: Moscow’s urban policy debates. Policy Studies Journal, 51(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12445
Schlaufer, Caroline, Kuenzler, Johanna, Jones, Michael D., & Shanahan, Elizabeth A. (2022). The Narrative Policy Framework: A Traveler’s Guide to Policy Stories. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 63(2), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00379-6
Seto, Karen C., Davis, Steven J., Mitchell, Ronald B., Stokes, Eleanor C., Unruh, Gregory, & Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana (2016). Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Jones, Michael D., McBeth, Mark K., & Radaelli, Claudio M. (2017). The Narrative Policy Framework. In Christopher M. Weible & Paul A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 173–213). Westview Press.
Simoens, Machteld C., Fuenfschilling, Lea,&Leipold, Sina (2022). Discursive dynamics and lock-ins in socio-technical systems: An overview and a way forward. Sustainability Science, 17(5), 1841–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01110-5
Stone, Deborah (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (3. ed.). W.W. Norton & Co.
Tutuncu, Azra N. (2021). Fossil Fuels. In K. J. Hancock & J. E. Allison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of energy politics (pp. 21–41). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190861360.013.1
Unruh, Gregory C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
Weible, Christopher M. (Ed.). (2023). Theories of the policy process (Fifth edition). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Weible, Christopher M., Olofsson, Kristin L., Costie, Daniel P., Katz, Juniper M., & Heikkila, Tanya (2016). Enhancing Precision and Clarity in the Study of Policy Narratives: An Analysis of Climate and Air Issues in Delhi, India. Review of Policy Research, 33(4), 420–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12181