Accompanying Migrant Children through their Everyday Lives. On the relation between research relationship and ethnographic field constitution

Main Article Content

Ursina Jaeger

Abstract

This article deals with methodological questions arising from the relationship between the establishment of (research) relationships and the emergence of an ethnographic field. Based on data from a long-term multi-site ethnography on belonging in a society shaped by migration, an ethnographic pathway is reconstructed that opened up while accompanying a child through the transnational everyday life. Situations along the way are described in which shifting loyalties and different authorities become visible in the social orders in which the ethnographer and the child interacted individually and with each other. I analyse how the ethnographic field is sometimes entangled in conflicting power dynamics through multi-referential social orders. Based on this reconstruction, I argue for granting analytically and socially adequate space to the processual, ethically complex situations in qualitative inequality research, thereby abandoning the construction if a ‘good research child’.
Keywords: Early childhood, kindergarten, multi-sited ethnography, migration, research relations, ethnographic pathways


Bibliography: Jaeger, Ursina: Migrationsandere Kinder durch den Alltag begleiten. Zum Verhältnis von Forschungsbeziehung und ethnografischer Feldkonstitution, ZQF – Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung, 2-2025, pp. 190-204.

Article Details

Published: December 2025
Open Access from: 2027-12-10
Open Access License: CC BY 4.0

Literature

Ayton, K. (2012): Differing Pupil Agency in the Face of Adult Positioning. In: Ethnography and Education, 7. Jg., H. 1, S. 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2012.661592

Bollig, S./Kelle, H. (2014): Kinder als Akteure oder als Partizipanden von Praktiken? Zu den Herausforderungen für eine akteurszentrierte Kindheitssoziologie durch Praxistheorien. In: Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 34. Jg., H. 3, S. 263–279.

Bourgois, P. I. (2002): Ethnography’s Troubles and the Reproduction of Academic Habitus. In: International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15. Jg., H. 4, S. 417–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390210145471

Breidenstein, G./Kelle, H. (1998): Geschlechteralltag in der Schulklasse: Ethnographische Studien zur Gleichaltrigenkultur. Weinheim.

Butschi, C./Hedderich, I. (2021): Kindgerecht forschen. Ein Überblick. In: Hedderich, I./Reppin, J./Butschi, J. (Hrsg.): Perspektiven auf Vielfalt in der frühen Kindheit. Mit Kindern Diversität erforschen. Leipzig, S. 101–119. https://doi.org/10.35468/5895-06

Christensen, P. (2004): Children’s Participation in EthnographicRresearch: Issues of power and representation. In: Children & Society, 18. Jg., H. 2, S. 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.823

Dean, J. (2021): Reflexivity and Its Limits in the Study of Social Inequalities. In: Historical Social Research, 46. Jg., H. 2, S. 11.

Diehm, I./Kuhn, M./Machold, C./Mai, M. (2013): Ethnische Differenz und Ungleichheit. Eine ethnographische Studie in Bildungseinrichtungen der frühen Kindheit. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 59. Jg., H. 5, S. 644–656.

Emmerich, M./Hormel, U. (2017): Soziale Differenz und gesellschaftliche Ungleichheit: Reflexionsprobleme in der erziehungswissenschaftlichen Ungleichheitsforschung. In: Diehm, I./Kuhn, M./Machold, C. (Hrsg.): Differenz – Ungleichheit – Erziehungswissenschaft. Wiesbaden, S. 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10516-7_6

Eßer, F./Baader, M. S./Betz, T./Hungerland, B. (Hrsg.) (2016): Reconceptualising Agency and Childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies. London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722245

Feldman-Savelsberg, P. (2016): Migranten, Recht und Identität: Afrikanische Mütter und das Ringen um Zugehörigkeit in Berlin. Bielefeld. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839436523

Glick Schiller, N./Çağlar, A./Guldbrandsen, T. C. (2006): Beyond the Ethnic Lens: Locality, Globality, and Born-Again Incorporation. In: American Ethnologist, 33. Jg., H. 4, S. 612–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.612

Hackett, A./Hall, M./Pahl, K./Kraftl, P. (2024): Giving up the ‘Good Research Child’. In: Qualitative Research, S. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241264490

Hammersley, M. (2017): Childhood Studies: A sustainable paradigm? In: Childhood, 24. Jg., H. 1, S. 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568216631399

Honig, M.-S./Lange, A./Leu, H.-R. (1999): Eigenart und Fremdheit. Kindheitsforschung und das Problem der Differenz von Kindern und Erwachsenen. In: Honig, M.-S./Lange, A./Leu, H.-R. (Hrsg.): Aus der Perspektive von Kindern? Zur Methodologie der Kindheitsforschung. Weinheim, S. 9–32.

Jaeger, U. (2024): Rendering Social Order Pedagogical. Caring for pupils’ diversification in a Swiss suburb. In: Gilliam, L./Makrom, C. (Hrsg.): Difference and Sameness in Schools. Perspectives from the European Anthropology of Education. Oxford, S. 51–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9891598.5

Jaeger, U. (2025): Children As Social Butterflies: Navigating Belonging in a Diverse Swiss Kindergarten. New York.

Jaeger, U./Nieswand, B. (2022): Multi-Sited Ethnography zwischen Lokalisierung und Mobilisierung, oder: ‚Should I Stay or Should I Go Now?‘ In: Poferl, A./Schröer, N. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Soziologische Ethnographie. Wiesbaden, S. 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26405-5_29

James, A. (2007): Giving Voice to Children’s Voices: Practices and Problems, Pitfalls and Potentials. In: American Anthropologist, 109. Jg., H. 2, S. 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.261

Joos, M./Alberth, L. (2022). Forschungsethik in der Kindheitsforschung – Dilemmata, Standards und Reflexionen für das Forschen über, zu und mit Kindern. In: Alberth, L./Joos, M. (Hrsg.): Forschungsethik in der Kindheitsforschung. Weinheim, S. 7–22.

Katz, V. S. (2014): Kids in the Middle: How Children of Immigrants Negotiate Community Interactions for Their Families. New York. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wq9nr

Khoja, N. (2016): Situating Children’s Voices: Considering the Context When Conducting Research with Young Children. In: Children & Society, 30. Jg., H. 4, S. 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12143

Kromidas, M. (2012): Affiliation or Appropriation? Crossing and the politics of race among children in New York City. In: Childhood, 19. Jg., H. 3., S. 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568212441036

Kromidas, M. (2016): City kids: Transforming racial baggage. New York.

Kusserow, A. S. (2004): American Individualisms: Child rearing and social class in three neighborhoods. New York.

Lancy, D. (2012): Unmasking Children’s Agency. In: AnthropoChildren, 2. Jg., S. 1–20. http://popups.ulg.ac.be/2034-8517/index.php?id=1253

Mai, H./Merl, T./Mohseni, M. (Hrsg.) (2018): Pädagogik in Differenz- und Ungleichheitsverhältnissen: Aktuelle erziehungswissenschaftliche Perspektiven zur pädagogischen Praxis. Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21833-1

Mandell, N. (1988): The Least-Adult Role in Studying Children. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16. Jg., H. 4, S. 433–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241688164002

Marcus, G. E. (1995): Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. In: Annual Review of Anthropology, 24. Jg., H. 1, S. 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523

Mecheril, P. (2010): Migrationspädagogik. Hinführung zu einer Perspektive. In: Mecheril, P./Castro Varela, M. d. M./Dirim, İ./Kalpaka, A./Melter, C. (Hrsg.): Migrationspädagogik. Weinheim, S. 7–22.

Meloni, F./Vanthuyne, K./Rousseau, C. (2015) : Towards a Relational Ethics: Rethinking ethics, agency and dependency in research with children and youth. In: Anthropological Theory, 15. Jg., H. 1, S. 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499614565945

Moors, A. (2019): The Trouble with Transparency: Reconnecting ethics, integrity, epistemology, and power. In: Ethnography, 20. Jg., H. 2, S.149–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138119844279

Nieswand, B. (2011): Theorising Transnational Migration: The status paradox of migration. London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810439

Orellana, M. F. (2009): Translating Childhoods: Immigrant youth, language, and culture. New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Prout, A./James, A. (1997): A New Paradigm for the Sociology of Childhood? Provenance, Promise and Problems. In: James, A./Prout, A. (Hrsg.): Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London, S. 35–58.

Punch, S. (2002): Research with Children: The Same or Different from Research with Adults? In: Childhood, 9. Jg., H. 3, S. 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568202009003005

Russell, L./Barley, R./Tummons, J. (Hrsg.) (2022): Ethics, Ethnography and Education. Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-210X202219

Shanahan, S. (2007): Lost and Found: The Sociological Ambivalence toward Childhood. In: Annual Review of Sociology, 33. Jg., S. 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131808

Spradley, J. P. (1980): Participant Observation. New York.

Spyrou, S. (2011): The Limits of Children’s Voices: From authenticity to critical, reflexive representation. In: Childhood, 18. Jg., H. 2, S. 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210387834

Werbner, P. (1999): Global Pathways. Working class cosmopolitans and the creation of transnational ethnic worlds. In: Social Anthropology, 7. Jg., H. 1, S. 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.1999.tb00176.x

Wolff, S. (2015): Wege ins Feld und ihre Varianten. In: Flick, U./Kardorff, E. von/Steinke, I. (Hrsg.): Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Hamburg, S. 334–349.

Zeitlyn, B./Mand, K. (2012): Researching Transnational Childhoods. In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38. Jg., H. 6, S. 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.677179

Read More