Democracy, Democracy Support and Democracy Socialization
Main Article Content
Abstract
What is the current democratic situation in the world? How can we explain the presence or absence of democracy in countries? How much popular support is there for democracy? How can we explain variance in this support for democracy? These are the key questions to answer in this article. Only a small fraction of the world's countries are democracies, and only a small fraction of the world's population lives in a democracy. Moreover, many existing democracies suffer from a gradual erosion. Favourable conditions for democracy include a positive economic development, a good functioning of the actual democracy, democratic leaders without autocratic temptations, and a strong and robust support for democracy among the population. Support for democracy among citizens in the world is however weak: only a minority said that a representative democracy is a very good way of governing the country and even less support a representative democracy without also supporting a non-democratic rule by experts, a strong leader or the military. Support for democracy on the individual level is the effect of various other orientations such as knowledge of democracy and autocracy, satisfaction with democracy, political trust, subjective well-being, and emancipatory values. People acquire these orientations through experience and socialization. Committed democrats are concerned with the decline of democracy and the intensifying wave of autocratization in the world over the past decade and ask for new initiatives to establish and defend democracy.
Keywords: democracy socialization, democracy support, democracy
Bibliography: Dekker, Henk: Democracy, Democracy Support and Democracy Socialization, PCS – Politics, Culture and Socialization, 2023-2024, pp. 8-30.
Article Details
Literature
Ariely, G. and Davidov, E. (2010). Can we rate public support for democracy in a comparable way? Crossnational equivalence of democratic attitudes in the World Value Survey. Social Indicators Research, 104, 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9693-5
Ariely, G., Davidov, E. (2014). Democratic attitudes measures: Cross-national equivalences, In: Michalos, A. C. (eds.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research, Dordrecht: Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3707
Bartels, L. M. (2023). Democracy erodes from the top: Leaders, citizens, and the challenge of populism in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carothers, Th. and Hartnett, B. (2024). Misunderstanding democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 35, 3, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2024.a930425
Cho, Y. (2014). To know democracy is to love it: A cross-national analysis of democratic understanding and political support for democracy. Political Research Quarterly 67, 3, 478-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914532721
Claassen, C. (2020a). Does public support help democracy survive? American Journal of Political Science 64 (1), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12452
Claassen, C. (2020b). In the mood for democracy? Democratic support as thermostatic opinion. American Political Science Review 114, 1, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000558
Claassen, C., Ackermann, K., Bertsou, E., Borba, L., Carlin, R.E., Cavari, A., Dahlum, S., Gherghina, S., Hawkins, D., Lelkes, Y., Magalhães, P.C., Mattes, R., Meijers, M.J., Neundorf, A., Oross, D., Oztürk, A., Sarsfield, R., Self, D., Stanley, B., Tsai T-h., Zaslove, A. and Zechmeister, E.J. (2024). Conceptualizing and measuring support for democracy: A new approach. Comparative Political Studies, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241259458
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dekker, H. (1996). Democratic citizen competence: political-psychological and political socialization research perspectives, in: Farnen, R. F., et al. (eds.), Democracy, socialization, and conflicting loyalties in East and West, New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press, 386-410.
Dekker, H., German, D. B., De Landtsheer, Chr. (2020). Political socialization theory, research, and application; History and analysis of forty years of the Research Committee on Political Socialization and Education of the International Political Science Association. Politics, Culture and Socialization 8 (1-2), 34- 80. the International Political Science Association: 1997-2019, PCS – Politics, Culture and Socialization, 1+2-2017, pp. 34-80. https://doi.org/10.3224/pcs.v8i1-2.03
Diskin, A., Diskin, H., Hazan, R.Y. (2005). Why democracies collapse: the reasons for democratic failure and success. International Political Science Review 26(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512105053787
Donner, S., Hartmann, H. (2024). Less democratic, less successful - BTI 2024 Global Findings. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/en/publications/publication/did/bti-2024-global-findings-less-democratic-less-successful
Economist Intelligence Unit, EIU (2024). Democracy Index 2023, Age of conflict. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2023/. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUVZ4HpXiJg
Fish, M. S.(2002), Islam and authoritarianism. World Politics, 55, 1, 4-37. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0004
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Foa, R.S., Klassen, A., Slade, M., Rand, A. and Collins, R. (2020). The global satisfaction with democracy report 2020. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Centre for the Future of Democracy.
Foa, R. S., Klassen, A., Wenger, D., Rand, A. and Slade, M. (2020). Youth and satisfaction with democracy: Reversing the democratic disconnect?. Cambridge, United Kingdom: the Centre for the Future of Democracy, the University of Cambridge. https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Youth_and_Satisfaction_with_Democracy-lite.pdf. https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/publications/youth-and-satisfaction-democracy
Foa, R.S., Mounk, Y., Klassen, A. (2022). Why the future cannot be predicted. Journal of Democracy, 33, 1, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2022.0010
Frantz, E., Kendall-Taylor, A., Nietsche, C. and Wright, J. (2021). How personalist politics is changing democracies. Journal of Democracy 32(3), 94-108. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0036
Freedom House: Gorokhovskaia, Y. and Grothe, C. (2024a). Freedom in the world 2024: The mounting damage of flawed elections and armed conflict. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/FIW_2024_DigitalBooklet.pdf
Freedom House (2024b). Freedom in the World 2024 Methodology Questions. https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology
Freedom House: Smeltzer, M. and Karppi, A. (2024). Nations in transit 2024, A region reordered by autocracy and democracy. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/NIT_2024_Digital_Booklet.pdf
Freedom House (2024). Nations in transit 2024 Methodology. https://freedomhouse.org/reports/nationstransit/nations-transit-methodology
Fuchs, D. and Roller, E. (2006). Learned democracy? Support of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Sociology, 36, 3, 70–96. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020–7659360303
Fuks, M., Paulino, R. O., and Casalecchi, G. A. (2018). Socialization and political regimes: The impact of generation on support for democracy in Latin America, Brazilian Political Science Review, 12(1), https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201800010001
Graham, M.H. and Svolik, M.W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114, 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E. and Puranen, B. (eds.) (2022). World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile Version 6.0. Madrid, Spain and Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.24.
Heyne, L. (2018). The making of democratic citizens: How regime-specific socialization shapes Europeans’ expectations of democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 25(1), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12338
Hu, Y, Tai, Y.C. and Solt, F. (2024). Revisiting the evidence on thermostatic response to democratic change: degrees of democratic support or researcher degrees of freedom?, Political Science Research and Methods. Published online 2024:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.16
IDEA (2024). The global state of democracy 2024, Strengthening the legitimacy of elections in a time of radical uncertainty. Stockholm: International IDEA. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2024.55
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Inglehart, R. (2003). How solid is mass support for democracy – And how can we measure it?, PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (1), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503001689
Inglehart, R., and Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jacob, M.S. (2024). Citizen support for democracy, anti-pluralist parties in power and democratic backsliding. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475676512703
Janssen, L. and Turkenburg, E. (2024). Breaking free from linear assumptions: Unravelling the relationship between affective polarization and democratic support. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475676512725
Knutsen, C.H. (2010). Measuring effective democracy. International Political Science Review, 31(2), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110364736
König, P. D., Siewert, M. B., Ackermann, K. (2022). Conceptualizing and measuring citizens’ preferences for democracy: Taking stock of three decades of research in a fragmented field. Comparative Political Studies, 55, 12, 2015-2046. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211066213.
Lührmann, A., Tannenberg, M., Lindberg, S.I. (2018). Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics and Governance, 6(1). https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1214
Morlino, L. and Montero, J. R. (1995). Legitimacy and democracy in southern Europe, in: Gunther, R. (ed.), The politics of democratic consolidation: Southern Europe in comparative perspective, Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Nord, M., Lundstedt, M., Altman, D., Angiolillo, F., Borella, C., Fernandes, T., Gastaldi, L., Good God, A.,
Natsika, N., and Lindberg, S.I. (2024). Democracy Report 2024: Democracy Winning and Losing at the Ballot, Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute.
Norris P. (ed.) (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olar, R.-G., and Neundorf, A. (2024). Winds of change: democratic transitions and long-term democratic support. Democratization, https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2405853
Pew Research Center: Wike, R., Simmons, K., Stokes, B. and Fetterolf, J. (2017). Globally, broad support for representative and direct democracy but many also endorse nondemocratic alternatives, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2017/10/16/globally-broad-support-for-representative-and-direct-democracy/
Pew Research Center: Wike, R. and Schumacher, S. (2020). Democratic rights popular globally but commitment to them not always strong. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/02/27/democratic-rightspopular-globally-but-commitment-to-them-not-always-strong/
Pew Research Center: Connaughton, A., Kent, N. and Schumacher, S. (2020). How people around the world see democracy in 8 charts. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/02/27/how-people-aroundthe-world-see-democracy-in-8-charts/
Pew Research Center: Wike, R., Fetterolf, J., Smerkovich, M., Austin, S., Gubbala, S. and Lippert, J. (2024a). Representative democracy remains a popular ideal, but people around the world are critical of how it’s working. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/02/gap_2024.02.28_democracy-closed-end_report.pdf. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/02/28/attitudes-toward-different-types-of-government-systems/
Pew Research Center (2024b). Topline questionnaire, Spring 2023 Global Attitudes Survey, February 28, 2024, Release. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/02/gap_2024.02.28_democracy-closed-end_topline.pdf
Pop-Eleches, G. and Tucker, J.A. (2013). Communist socialization and post-communist economic and political attitudes. Electoral Studies 33, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.008
Robert Bosch Stiftung (2021). Itʼs complicated; People and their democracy in Germany, France, Britain, Poland, and the United States. Stuttgart: Robert Bosch Stiftung, and Berlin: More in Common Deutschland. https://www.moreincommon.com/attitudes-toward-democracy/
Schedler, A., and Sarsfield, R. (2007). Democrats with adjectives: Linking direct and indirect measures of democratic support. European Journal of Political Research 46, 5, 637-659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00708.x.
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Damiani, V., and Friedman, T. (2023). Education for citizenship in times of global challenge, IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2022 International Report, Amsterdam: IEA. https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2023-12/ICCS-2022-International-Report.pdf
Slipowitz, A. and Gorokhovskaia (2023). Leaders without limits and the shadow of the past: Understanding democratic decline. Perspectives 24 July 2023. https://freedomhouse.org/article/leaders-without-limitsand-shadow-past-understanding-democratic-decline
Song, S. and Kim, N. K. (2024). What makes voters willing to tolerate undemocratic behaviours? Survey experiment from South Korea. Democratization. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2436016
Stallbaum, L. (2024), Socialism’s legacy: the impact of political socialization on citizens’ conceptions of democracy. Democratization. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2392280
Svolik, M.W., Avramovska, E., Lutz J., and Milačciç, F. (2023). In Europe, democracy erodes from the right. Journal of Democracy, 34, 1, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2023.0000
Tai, Y.C., Hu, Y. and Solt, F. (2024). Democracy, public support, and measurement uncertainty. American Political Science Review 118, 1, 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000429
Welzel, Chr. and Klingemann, H.-D. (2008). Evidencing and explaining democratic congruence: The perspective of ‘substantive’ democracy. World Values Research 1 (3), 57-90. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSPublicationsPapers.jsp
Welzel, Chr. (2021a). Democratic horizons: what value change reveals about the future of democracy. Democratization, 28 (5), 992-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1883001
Welzel, Chr. (2021b). Why the future is democratic. Journal of Democracy, 32, 2, 132-144. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0024
Welzel, Chr., Kruse, S., and Brunkert, L. (2022). Why the future is (still) democratic. Journal of Democracy, 33, 1, 156-162. https://doi.com/10.1353/jod.2022.0011
Wuttke A., Gavras K., and Schoen H. (2020). Have Europeans grown tired of democracy? New evidence from eighteen consolidated democracies, 1981–2018. British Journal of Political Science 52, 1: 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000149