The analysis of political equivocation by British political leaders

Main Article Content

Peter Bull

Abstract

Equivocation, sometimes referred to as “the intentional use of precise language”, is the focus of this article. Data are reported concerning the extent to which politicians equivocate in televised interviews and Prime Minister’s Questions (so-called reply-rate). In addition, methodological techniques devised by Peter Bull and colleagues for the analysis of equivocation are discussed. These involve the identification of different types of questions, whereby it is possible to establish whether a politician has provided an answer. An equivocation typology is presented, whereby 43 techniques of not replying to a question are identified. Examples of equivocation by recent British political leaders are discussed: Conservative Prime Ministers: Margaret Thatcher, John Major, David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson; Labour Leaders of the Opposition: Neil Kinnock, Ed Miliband, Jeremy Corbyn; Liberal Democrats leaders: Paddy Ashdown, Nick Clegg, Tim Farron; UKIP leaders (United Kingdom Independence Party): Nigel Farage, Paul Nuttall.
Keywords: equivocation, equivocation typology, reply-rate, questions, non-replies, Prime Minister’s Questions


Extract


Bibliography: Bull, Peter: The analysis of political equivocation by British political leaders, PCS – Politics, Culture and Socialization, 2023-2024, pp. 69-83.

Article Details

Published: May 2025

Literature

Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA:

Sage.

Bull, P. (1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94132002

Bull, P. (1997). Queen of hearts or queen of the arts of implication? Implicit criticisms and their implications for equivocation theory in the interview between Martin Bashir and Diana, Princess of Wales. Social Psychological Review, 1, 27-36.

Bull, P. (2000b). Equivocation and the rhetoric of modernization: An analysis of televised interviews with Tony Blair in the 1997 British General Election. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(2), 222-247.

Bull, P. (2003). The microanalysis of political communication: Claptrap and ambiguity. London, England: Routledge.

Bull, P. (2016, October 24). Theresa May has a very special technique for avoiding questions. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/theresa-may-has-a-very-special-technique-foravoiding-questions-67424

Bull, P., & Strawson, W. (2020). Can’t answer? Won’t answer? An analysis of equivocal responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s Questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(2), 429-449.

Bull, P., & Waddle, M. (2019). “Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question”: The impact of quoting members of the public in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(1), 56-78.

Bull, P. & Waddle, M. (2022). Under the microscope: Prime Minister’s Questions in the UK Parliament. In A. Weinberg (Ed.), The Psychology of Democracy (pp.84-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Feldman, O., Kinoshita, K. & Bull, P (2015). Culture or communicative conflict? The analysis of equivocation in broadcast Japanese political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14557567

Hamilton, M. A., & Mineo, P. J. (1998). A framework for understanding equivocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17(1), 3-35.

Harris, S. (1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scannell (Ed.), Broadcast talk (pp. 76-99). London, England: Sage.

Hope, C. (2019, May 1). Theresa May is most evasive Tory leader in past 50 years, scientific study finds. The Telegraph. Retrieved from www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/04/30/theresa-may-evasive-tory-leaderpast-50-years-scientific-study/

Jucker, A. H. (1986). News interviews: A pragmalinguistic analysis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow, United Kingdom: Longman.

Waddle, M., & Bull, P. (2016). Playing the man, not the ball: Personalisation in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(4), 412-434.

Waddle, M., & Bull, P. (2020a). Curbing their antagonism: Topics associated with a reduction in personal attacks at Prime Minister’s Questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(3), 543-564.

Waddle, M., & Bull, P. (2020b). “Of course I’m going to ask about that”: The politics of opposition during a national crisis. British Psychological Society Political Psychology Bulletin (Summer 2020).

Waddle, M., Bull, P., & Böhnke, J. R. (2019). “He is just the nowhere man of British politics”: Personal attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(1), 61-84.

Wodak, R. (Ed.) (1989). Language, power and ideology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Read More