Knocking at the House with Closed Doors: Metaphorical representation of European integration in Ukrainian media discourse before 2014
Main Article Content
Abstract
The idea of European integration played an important role in Ukrainian political discourse, but was attributed different meaning in the course of its political development. This idea was crucial for a definition of Ukrainian foreign policy preferences and for the construction of Ukrainian national identity. In the Ukrainian context, this idea was found to be primarily constructed in regard to the question of the historical and geopolitical place of Ukraine. Public opinion in general largely reflects the instability in Ukraine-EU relations, as well as the inconsistent European integration policy of the Ukrainian government and the lack of a coherent policy from the side of the European Union. This article focuses on a study of how the European integration was conceptualized and metaphorically presented in the Ukrainian press in the period of 2005 – 2010. By examining the metaphors used to describe this process in the Ukrainian media between 2005 and 2010, we gain valuable insights into the historical and discursive nuances that have shaped contemporary perceptions of European integration in Ukraine. Based on the Critical Metaphor Analysis and Conceptual Metaphors approach, we investigate the main frames and metaphorical representations of Europe and the European integration in the Ukrainian media. It can be noticed that the European integration was described in Ukraine before 2014 with a tension between the two discourses – the discourses of closeness and of openness. The European Neighborhood Policy was created for an opening of the door for Ukraine to Europe and as a ‘road map’ for the Ukrainian way towards the EU. Despite that, for the majority of Ukrainians the EU before 2014 was still an unrealistic ‘dream’ where doors were ‘rather closed’ then opened.
Keywords: European integration, Europe, Ukraine, discourse, media, metaphors
Bibliography: Polegkyi, Oleksii / De Landtsheer, Christ'l: Knocking at the House with Closed Doors: Metaphorical representation of European integration in Ukrainian media discourse before 2014, PCS – Politics, Culture and Socialization, 2023-2024, pp. 84-97.
Article Details
Literature
Beer, F. A., De Landtsheer, C. (2004). Metaphorical world politics. Michigan State University Press.
Börzel, T. (2010). The Transformative Power of Europe Reloaded. The Limits of External Europeanization, KFG Working Paper Series, No. 11, February.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, P., Ilyin, M. (1993). “Metaphor in Political Discourse: the Case of the ‘Common European House’”, Discourse and Society, 4 (1):7-31.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: theory and practice. Routledge.
Chong, D. & Druckman, J. (2007). Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies American Political Science Review 101 (November): 637-656.
De Landtsheer, C., De Vrij, I. (2004). “Talking about Srebrenica. Dutch Elites and Dutchbat. How Metaphors Change during Crisis.” In Beer, F., De Landtsheer, C. (eds.) Metaphorical World Politics. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, pp. 163- 189.
Huelsse, R. (2006). Imagine the EU: the metaphorical construction of a supra- nationalist identity, Journal of International Relations and Development, Nr 9: 396–421.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know that Liberals Don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musolff, A. (2000). Political Imagery of Europe: A House Without Exit Doors? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (21):216–29.
Popescu, N., Wilson, A. (2009). The Limits of Enlargement-lite: European and Russian Power in the Troubled Neighbourhood. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).
Radzievska T.V. (1997). Concept of the path in the Ukrainian language: combining of ideas of space and movement. Movoznavstvo, № 4 – 5.
Ricoeur, P. (2003). The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language. Routledge: London and New York.
Ringmar, E. (2007). The Power of Metaphor: Consent, Dissent and Revolution. In Mole, Richard C.M. (Ed.) Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics, Palgrave Macmillan.
Sushko, O., Parkhomenko N. (eds.) (2003). European Integration of Ukraine: As Viewed by Top Ukrainian Politicians, Businessmen and Society Leaders, Stefan Batory Foundation, Warsaw.
Van Dijk, T. (1997). “What is Political Discourse Analysis” In Blommaert, J., Bulcaen, C. (eds.) Political Linguistics, VI.
Yavorska G. (2002). Political rhetoric and reality of European integration [Politychna rytoryka ta realii yevropeys`koii integratsii]. Viche, № 7:66 - 71.
Yavorskaya G., Bogomolov O. (2010). Nepevnyi ob'iekt bazhannia: Evropa v ukrains'komu politychnomu dyskursi. [Vague Object of Desire: Europe in Ukrainian Political Discourse] Kyiv.