Fobizz als „Schlüssel zur KI-Welt“? Wie ein Unternehmen die Integration von KI im deutschen Schulwesen prägt
Main Article Content
Abstract
Bibliography: Joecks, Lucas: Fobizz als „Schlüssel zur KI-Welt“? Wie ein Unternehmen die Integration von KI im deutschen Schulwesen prägt, Pädagogische Korrespondenz, 2-2025 (Heft 72), pp. 3-21.
Article Details
Literature
Adipat, Surattana et al. (2021): Engaging Students in the Learning Process with Game-Based Learning: The Fundamental Concepts. In: International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), S. 542-552.
Ananny, Mike (2024): Make AI a Public Problem. In: Issues in Science and Technology, 40(2), S. 88.
Ball, Stephen J. (2017): Laboring to Relate: Neoliberalism, Embodied Policy, and Network Dynamics. In: Peabody Journal of Education, 92(1), S. 29-41.
Business Insider (2022): Scrum und New Work an der Schule – sie wollen Bildung zukunftsfähig machen (Bosse, Steffen). https://www.businessinsider.de/gruenderszene/perspektive/fobizz-wie-ein-hamburger-startup-die-schule-digitalisieren-will/ [Zugriff: 15.05.2025].
Carpenter, Jeffrey P./Shelton, Catharyn C./Schroeder, Stephanie E. (2023): The education influencer: A new player in the educator professional landscape. In: Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 55(5), S. 749-764.
Castañeda, Linda/Williamson, Ben (2021): Assembling New Toolboxes of Methods and Theories for Innovative Critical Research on Educational Technology. In: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(10), S. 1–14.
Cone, Lucas et al. (2021): Pandemic Acceleration: Covid-19 and the emergency digitalization of European education. In: European Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 845-868.
Criollo, Santiago et al. (2021): Mobile Learning Technologies for Education: Benefits and Pending Issues. In: Applied Sciences, 11(9), S. 4111.
Fobizz (2025a): Fobizz wirkt: Wissenschaftlich belegte Wirksamkeit. https://fobizz.com/de/fobizz-wirkt/ [Zugriff: 15.05.2025].
Fobizz (2025b): Preise & Angebote von Fobizz. https://fobizz.com/de/preise/ [Zugriff: 09.09.2025].
Förschler, Annina (2018): Das „Who is who?“ der deutschen Bildungs-Digitalisierungsagenda. In: Pädagogische Korrespondenz, Heft 58, S. 31-52. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:21106
Füller, Christian (2024): KI an den Schulen. Wie ein Edtech an Baden-Württemberg scheitert. https://background.tagesspiegel.de/digitalisierung-und-ki/briefing/wie-ein-edtech-an-baden-wuerttemberg-scheitert [Zugriff: 09.09.2025].
Gulson, Kalervo N./Witzenberger, Kevin (2022): Repackaging authority: artificial intelligence, automated governance and education trade shows. In: Journal of Education Policy, 37(1), S. 145-160.
Hartong, Sigrid/Geiss, Michael/Röhl, Tobias (2024): Intermediaries and the digital transformation of schooling: An introduction. In: Research in Education, 120(1), S. 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237241258700
Jasanoff, Sheila/Kim, Sang-Hyun (2015): Dreamscapes of modernity. Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Joecks, Lucas (2024): Exploring the intermediary role of ed-tech consulting in Germany: In-between policy, pedagogy, and economics. In: Research in Education, 120(1), S. 14-34.
Kelso, Easton et al. (2024): Trust, Because You Can’t Verify: Privacy and Security Hurdles in Education Technology Acquisition Practices. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. CCS ’24. New York, S. 1656-1670.
Kerssens, Niels/de Haan, Mariëtte (2022): The tipping point in the platformisation of Dutch public education? How to approach platformisation from a values-based perspective. In: Pangrazio, L./Sefton-Green, J. (Hrsg.): Learning to Live with Datafication. London: Routledge, S. 119-131.
Kerssens, Niels/Nichols, T. Philip/Pangrazio, Luci (2023): Googlization(s) of education: intermediary work brokering platform dependence in three national School systems. In: Learning, Media and Technology, 49(3), S. 478-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2258339
Kerssens, Niels/van Dijck, José (2021): The platformization of primary education in The Netherlands. In: Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), S. 250-263.
Kultusminister Konferenz (KMK) (2024): Handlungsempfehlung für die Bildungsverwaltung zum Umgang mit Künstlicher Intelligenz in schulischen Bildungsprozessen. https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2024/2024_10_10-Handlungsempfehlung-KI.pdf [Zugriff: 15.05.2025].
Lo, Chung Kwan (2023): What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. In: Education Sciences, 13(4), S. 410.
Luccioni, Alexandra Sasha/Jernit, Yacine/Strubell, Emma (2024): Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment? In: FAccT ‘24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, S. 85-99.
Macgilchrist, Felicitas/Hartong, Sigrid/Jornitz, Sieglinde (2023): Algorithmische Datafizierung und Schule: kritische Ansätze in einem wachsenden Forschungsfeld. In: Scheiter, Katharina/Gogolin, Ingrid (Hrsg.): Bildung für eine digitale Zukunft. Wiesbaden: Springer, S. 317-338.
Manolev, Jamie/Sullivan, Anna/Slee, Roger (2019): The datafication of discipline: ClassDojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture. In: Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), S. 36-51.
Ministerium für Bildung Rheinland-Pfalz (BM RLP) (2025): Rheinland-Pfalz erwirbt Lizenz für Schulen. https://bm.rlp.de/schule/fobizz [Zugriff: 15.05.2025].
Ministerium für Bildung und Kindertagesförderung des Landes M-V (BM MV) (2024): fobizz-Kooperation wird fortgesetzt.
Mühlhoff, Rainer/Henningsen, Marte (2024): Chatbots im Schulunterricht: Wir testen das Fobizz-Tool zur automatischen Bewertung von Hausaufgaben. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06651 [Zugriff: 10.10.2025]
Nichols, T. Philip/Dixon-Román, Ezekiel (2024): Platform Governance and Education Policy: Power and Politics in Emerging Edtech Ecologies. In: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 46(2), S. 309-328.
OECD/UNESCO (2024): G7 Toolkit for AI in the Public Sector. Paris: OECD.
Ortegón, Carlos/Decuypere, Mathias/Williamson, Ben (2024): Mediating educational technologies: Edtech brokering between schools, academia, governance, and industry. In: Research in Education, 120(1), S. 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237241242990
Parreira do Amaral, Marcelo (2016): Neue Akteure der Governance des Bildungssystems – Typen, Einflussmöglichkeiten und Instrumente. In: Altrichter, Herbert/Maag Merki, Katharina (Hrsg.): Handbuch Neue Steuerung im Schulsystem. Wiesbaden: Springer, S. 455-477.
Perrotta, Carlo/Selwyn, Neil/Ewin, Carrie (2024): Artificial intelligence and the affective labour of understanding: The intimate moderation of a language model. In: New Media & Society, 26(3), S. 1585-1609.
Player-Koro, Catarina/Bergviken Rensfeldt, Annika/Selwyn, Neil (2018): Selling tech to teachers: education trade shows as policy events. In: Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), S. 682-703.
Richter, Christoph et al. (2025): Digital infrastructures for education: On sociotechnical entrenchment, pedagogy and the public interest. In: European Educational Research Journal, S. 1-23.
Saldaña, Christopher M. et al. (2021): Teachers as market influencers: Towards a Policy framework for teacher brand ambassador programs in K-12 schools. In: Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5654
Scheiter, Katharina et al. (2025): Künstliche Intelligenz in der Schule: Eine Handreichung zum Stand in Wissenschaft und Praxis. Bonn: BMBF. https://www.empirische-bildungsforschung-bmbfsfj.de/img/KI_Review_20250318_Veroeffentlichung.pdf [Zugriff: 10.10.2025].
Selwyn, Neil (2021): Ed-Tech Within Limits: Anticipating educational technology in times of environmental crisis. In: E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(5), S. 496-510.
Troeger, Jasmin et al. (2023): Digital ist besser!? – Wie Software das Verständnis von guter Schule neu definiert. In: Bock, A. et al. (Hrsg.): Die datafizierte Schule. Wiesbaden: Springer, S. 93-129.
van Dijck, José (2013): The culture of connectivity. A critical history of social media. New York: Oxford University Press.
van Dijck, José/Poell, Thomas/Waal, Martijn de (2018): The platform society. Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.
van Maanen, Gijs (2022): AI Ethics, Ethics Washing, and the Need to Politicize Data Ethics. In: Digital society ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology, 1(2), S. 9.
Weiß, Eva-Maria (2021): Hessen beendet Schonfrist für MS Teams an Schulen. https://www.heise.de/news/Hessen-beendet-Schonfrist-fuer-MS-Teams-an-Schulen-6003885.html [Zugriff: 09.09.2025].
Williamson, Ben et al. (2022): Amazon and the new global connective architectures of education governance. In: Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), S. 231-256.
Williamson, Ben et al. (2023): Critical perspectives on AI in education: political economy, discrimination, commercialization, governance and ethics. In: Du Boulay, B./Mitrovic, A./Yacef, K. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, S. 553-570.
Williamson, Ben/Eynon, Rebecca (2020): Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. In: Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), S. 223-235.
Williamson, Ben/Hogan, Anna (2020): Commercialisation and privatisation in/of education in the context of Covid-19. Education International Research. https://www.ei-ie.org/en/item/25251:commercialisation-and-privatisation-inof-education-in-the-context-of-covid-19 [Zugriff: 10.10.2025].
Zhai, Chunpeng/Wibowo, Santoso/Li, Lily D. (2024): The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. In: Smart Learning Environments, 11(28). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7c