Manipulating Truth: Disinformation Campaigns Against Child Protection Services in Europe

Main Article Content

Suljo Corsulic

Abstract

Disinformation targeting child protection services (CPS) in Europe poses a significant challenge to institutional legitimacy and social cohesion. This paper analyses recurring narratives and themes found within 45 fact-checking reports about CPS, using qualitative methods and Habermas’s public sphere theory as interpretive framework. Results show that authoritarian and fundamentalist actors strategically create and disseminate disinformation that aim to polarise discussions about topics such as family values, state authority, and child welfare. By mapping actors, targets, and themes, this paper demonstrates how disinformation narratives are constructed and circulated across different ideological contexts. This study contributes to research on disinformation and child welfare by clarifying how CPS in Europe is framed and politicised in disinformation campaigns. Additionally, the study aims to provide a useful basis for policymakers and practitioners in the broader efforts to recognise and respond to disinformation around child welfare and protection, and other public institutions.

Keywords: disinformation, public sphere, child protection services, right-wing extremism, public trust

Bibliography: Corsulic, Suljo: Manipulating Truth: Disinformation Campaigns Against Child Protection Services in Europe, ZRex – Zeitschrift für Rechtsextremismusforschung, 2-2026, pp. 217-237.

Article Details

Published: October 2026
Open Access License: CC BY 4.0

Literature

Aro, Jessika (2022). Putin's trolls: On the frontlines of Russia's information war against the world. New York: Ig Publishing. https://doi.org/10.23865/noros.v37.5241

Berrick, Jill Duer; Skivenes, Marit & Roscoe, Joseph (2023). Public perceptions of child protection, children’s rights, and personal values: An assessment of two states. Children and Youth Services Review, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106960

Bruns, Axel & Highfield, Tim (2016). Is Habermas on Twitter? Social media and the public sphere. In Axel Bruns, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbø, Anders Olof Larsson, & Christian Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 56–73). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299-5

Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), (pp. 77–101). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burns, Kenneth; Halvey, Olwen; Súilleabháin, Fiachra Ó.; O’Callaghan, Elaine; Coelho, Gabriel (2024). The Social Media, Online and Digital Abuse and Harassment of Social Workers, Probation Officers and Social Work Students in Ireland: A National Survey. The British Journal of Social Work, 54(7), (pp. 3274–3294). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae091

Conrad, Maximilian; Hálfdanarson, Guðmundur; Michailidou, Asimina; Galpin, Charlotte; & Pyrhönen, Niko (2022). Europe in the age of post-truth politics: Populism, disinformation and the public sphere. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8

Conrad, Maximilian & Hálfdanarson, Guðmundur (2022). Introduction: Europe in the age of post-truth politics. In M. Conrad & G. Hálfdanarson (Eds.), Europe in the age of post-truth politics: Populism, disinformation and the public sphere (pp. 1–9). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8_1

Colley, Thomas; Granelli, Francesca & Althuis, Jente (2020). Disinformation's societal impact: Britain, COVID and beyond. Defence Strategic Communications, 8(1), (pp. 89–140). https://doi.org/10.30966/2018.RIGA.8.3

Collins, Harry; Evans, Robert; Durant, Darrin & Weinel, Martin (2020). Experts and the will of the people: Society, Populism and Science. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26983-8

Datta, Neil (2025). Think of the children! Children’s rights as the new frontier in anti-gender contestation. In Hege Stein Helland; Marit Skivenes & Siri Gloppen (Eds.), Child Protection and the European Court of Human Rights: Lessons from Norway in the development and contestation of children’s rights, (pp. 153–177). Bristol: Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447371496.ch009

European Digital Media Observatory. (n.d.). EDMO – United against disinformation. Retrieved 7 August 2024, from: https://edmo.eu/

Economist Intelligence Unit. (2025, February 27). Democracy Index 2024: What’s wrong with representative democracy? The Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved 3 March 2025, from https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2024/

Eurochild. (2019a). Bulgaria’s National Strategy for the Child 2019–2030 withdrawn following disinformation campaigns. Retrieved 8 September 2024, from https://eurochild.org/news/bulgarias-national-strategy-for-the-child-2019-2030-withdrawn-following-disinformation-campaigns/

Eurochild. (2019b). Child rights under attack in Bulgaria. Retrieved 8 September 2024, from https://eurochild.org/news/child-rights-under-attack-in-bulgaria/

Evolvi, Giulia (2023). “Europe is Christian, or It Is Not Europe”: Post-Truth Politics and Religion in Matteo Salvini’s Tweets. In: Conrad, Maximilian; Hálfdanarson, Guðmundur; Michailidou, Asimina; Galpin, Charlotte; Pyrhönen, Niko (eds) Europe in the Age of Post-Truth Politics. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology (pp. 129–148). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8_7

Habermas, Jürgen (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Neuwied & Berlin: Luchterhand.

Hellman, Maria (2024a). Security, disinformation and harmful narratives: RT and Sputnik news coverage about Sweden. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58747-4

Hellman, Maria (2024b). Disinformation as a security problem. In Security, disinformation and harmful narratives: RT and Sputnik news coverage about Sweden (pp. 1–27). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58747-4_4

Hellman, Maria (2024c). Narrative analysis and framing analysis of disinformation. In Security, disinformation and harmful narratives: RT and Sputnik news coverage about Sweden (pp. 101–121). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58747-4_4

Kumar, Anoop & Maurya, Mohit Kumar (2024). Online public sphere and threats of disinformation, extremism and hate speech: Reflections on threat-mitigation. Journal of Communication Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599241292623

Marsden, Chris; Meyer, Trisha & Brown, Ian (2020). Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation? Computer Law & Security Review, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105373

Nenova, Gergana; Luleva, Ana & Kotzeva, Tatyana (2024). Caring for the child, caring for the family: The clash over the National Strategy for the Child (2019–2030) in Bulgaria. East European Politics and Societies, 38(2), (pp. 682–702). https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254231183002

Nieminen, Hannu (2024). Why does disinformation spread in liberal democracies? The relationship between disinformation, inequality, and the media. Javnost - The Public, 31(1), (pp. 123–140). https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2024.2311019

OECD. (2024). OECD survey on drivers of trust in public institutions – 2024 results: Building trust in a complex policy environment. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en

Oyserman, Daphna & Dawson, Andrew (2021). Your fake news, our facts: Identity‑based motivation shapes what we believe, share, and accept. In Rainer Greifeneder, Mariela Jaffé, Eryn Newman & Norbert Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation, (pp. 173–195). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295379-13

Pavlíková, Miroslava & Mareš, Miroslav (2020). "Barnevernet steals children": An analysis of Russian information warfare narratives in the Czech disinformation media. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 24(4), (pp. 589–605). https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2020.4.07

Ranstorp, Magnus & Ahlerup, Linda (2024). The LVU campaign: The disinformation campaign against Swedish social services: Disinformation, conspiracy theories and domestic-international links related to malign influence activities by non-state actors. Stockholm: Försvarshögskolan (FHS). Retrieved 13 February 2025 from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-12589

Riessman, Catherine Kohler (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

Rucinska, Silvia; Fecko, Miroslav & Mital, Oondrej (2023). Trust in public institutions in the age of disinformation. In Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2023, (pp. 111–117). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3603304.3604075

Sentiido (2021) ‘Manufacturing moral panic: Weaponizing children to undermine gender justice and human rights’. Retrieved 13 February 2025 from https://globalphilanthropyproject.org/2021/03/24/manufacturing-moral-panic/

Skivenes, Marit (2021). Exploring populations’ view on thresholds and reasons for child protection intervention: Comparing England, Norway, Poland and Romania. European Journal of Social Work, (pp. 92–107). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1995706

Skivenes, Marit & Benbenishty, Rami (2022). Populations’ trust in the child protection system: A cross-country comparison of nine high-income jurisdictions. Journal of European Social Policy, 32(4), (pp. 422–435). https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287221088172

Svatoňová, Eva (2021). ‘Gender activists will kidnap your kids’: The construction of feminist and LGBT+ rights activists as modern folk devils in Czech anti-gender campaigns. In M. Frederiksen & I. Harboe Knudsen (Eds.), Modern folk devils: Contemporary constructions of evil, (pp. 143–161). London: Humanities Press. https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-13-8

Zinkanell, Michael (2020). Disinformation during Covid-19 from a European perspective. Vienna: AIES Fokus 3/2020. Österreichisches Institut für Europa- und Sicherheitspolitik (AIES). Retrieved 14 February 2025, from https://www.aies.at/publikationen/2020/fokus-20-03.php

Zimmermann, Fabian & Kohring, Mathias (2020). Mistrust, disinforming news, and vote choice: A panel survey on the origins and consequences of believing disinformation in the 2017 German parliamentary election. Political Communication, 37(2), (pp. 215–237). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095

Read More